Res judicata: Differs in that it

Res judicata differs in that it restricts the re-trial of the entire civil matter, rather than just judicial decisions on small, yet important, issues within the original case. The difference between res judicata and collateral estoppel then becomes a question of whether the court is being asked to make a judgment on an issue, or on a claim. Understand the meaning of Res Judicata in Indian law with key examples, case laws, and how this legal doctrine prevents repetitive litigation. The doctrine of res judicata safeguards the final and binding effect of decisions in three ways. The doctrine precludes re-litigation of the same subject-matter within the same proceeding, e.g. after a partial decision (such as on jurisdiction) 1 or after the partial annulment of an award. 2 The doctrine precludes re-litigation of the same subject-matter between the same parties in follow-up proceedings in that duplicative claims are inadmissible (ne bis in idem). 3 If the subject-matter of ... Learn the meaning, history, objectives, essentials, exceptions, and case laws of Res Judicata , a principle that bars re-litigation of settled matters. Find out how Res Judicata operates in India and compare it with common law countries.